The Regular Meeting of the Doylestown Township Board of
Supervisors was held at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 15, 2008
at the Doylestown Township Municipal Building, 425 Wells
Road, Doylestown, PA., Members of the Board of Supervisors
in attendance included: Barbara N. Lyons, Chairman; E.
Thomas Scarborough, Jr., Vice Chairman; Barbara Eisenhardt,
Cynthia Philo and Jeffrey Bennett. Others in attendance
included Tim Duffy, Township Solicitor; Lt. Dean Logan,
Police Department; and Stephanie Mason, Township Manager.
Absent: Mario Canales, Township Engineer
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Ms. Lyons announced that this meeting is being taped
recorded.
Ms. Lyons indicated that the Board had been in an Executive
Session beginning @ 6:30 PM to discuss a personnel matter.
PRESENTATIONS
CENTRAL BUCKS AMBULANCE AND RESCUE UNIT –DISCUSSION &
DECISION ON PROPOSED DEDICATED TAX
Cathy Schlager from the Central Bucks Ambulance & Rescue
Unit (CBA&RU) was present to review with the Board their
request for ¼ mill tax increase to be added to the November
ballot to be a dedicated funding source to the Central Bucks
Ambulance & Rescue Unit for capital purchases. It is
anticipated that the ¼ mill tax would generate approximately
$70,000 of which 88% would go to the Central Bucks Ambulance
& Rescue Unit, the remaining percentages would be split
between the Warrington Ambulance and the Chalfont Ambulance
service who currently provide services to portions of our
community.
The CBA&RU anticipates that this would generate over $50,000
to them and would be similar to the allocation presently
provided to the ambulance of $50,000 in the general fund
budget through the LST tax the Board has done in 2008.
Ms. Eisenhardt commented that other municipalities have
given money. Due to gas costs and other costs and she
believes that giving the tax payer the ability to
participate in the process is appropriate and that we need
to continue to insure ambulance squads can provide service
to the community similar to the fire companies.
She
also indicated that under the second class township code, the
township can allocate a special tax up to ½ mill. She believes
it is more appropriate to have the voters participate. Putting
it on the ballot allows them the opportunity to do that.
Ms.
Eisenhardt then made a MOTION to add a ¼ mill tax in the
November referendum to be provided to the CBA&RU. Mr.
Scarborough seconded the MOTION.
Mr.
Scarborough indicated that the township needs the ambulance. He
indicated that he’s not sure what Buckingham or others might be
doing but it behooves the township to let the residents make the
decision. It would also help the Chalfont and Warrington rescue
units that also serve a portion of our community, but knowing
that CBA&RU provides the largest coverage they would get the
larger share. He indicated that he appreciates the Ways and
Means input into the matter but believes that the ambulance is
needed and he is in favor of putting the tax request on the
ballot.
Ms.
Philo questioned if the Board of Supervisors had to make a
decision now to put it on the ballot. They indicated that they
would.
Mr.
Bennett commented that the ambulance does receive payments for
transports threw health/auto insurance and subscriptions and
believes it’s a wonderful service that they provide, but feels
its different from the fire service. Mr. Bennett indicated that
he gain insight into the topic, once the ¼ mill steps are
approved it would benefit the ambulance but making that
commitment, not knowing what the other municipalities are doing.
He wants to make sure we are not paying more than our fair
share. He had a concern regarding a recent article in the paper
where Warwick and Buckingham are considering forming their own
ambulance service. He wonders how that will impact the township.
He supports the $50,000 that is currently allocated from the
budge from the LST through the general fund and believes the
township should continue to operate that way.
Mark Glassman, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, was
present. He indicated that the committee may come back to the
Board of Supervisors with a ½ mill or the ¼ mill allocation but
felt that the committee needed more time to review the
information. The allocation should be provided through the
budget process but not placed on the ballot at the present time.
Mr.
Pressler, Chief of the CBA&SU, commented that Warrington
Township has provided service to Doylestown without any benefit
of any funding and would appreciate receiving some in the
future.
Ms.
Philo commented that volunteer services for fire and ambulance
are necessary and that we rely on them. The decision should be
public to increase what is provided to them. The public may say
no and ask us to leave it alone. However, dedication and funding
this service is going to be necessary for more likely for
ambulance then fire in the future.
Ms.
Eisenhardt commented that the LST 25% has to go to emergency
services.
Ms.
Mason confirmed that the Township is allocating 25% LST to the
Emergency Services.
Mr.
Bennett again indicated that he supports the $50,000 that is
budgeted.
Mr.
Glassman provided the board with insight into the Ways and Means
Committee’s position on why they recommended the ¼ mill not be
placed on the ballot, but that the allocation should continue
from the general fund and that further study of the allocation
should continue.
Mrs. Eisenhardt questioned Mr. Glassman’s approach to the Ways
and Means Committee’s views on the ¼ mill and the need for it to
go on the ballot.
Mr.
Paternostro, Houck Road, indicated that he was disturbed by
speakers being allowed to be interrupted during the meetings. He
would have liked to hear more of Mr. Glassman’s thoughts on the
topic, since the Board went to the trouble of forming a Ways and
Means Committee.
Ty
Compton, Eagle Lane, indicated that he received a request from
the CBA&RU and Warrington Ambulance. He is not sure who is
coming to his house. When he lived in NJ he had only one
ambulance service that provided service to him.
Doris Clegg, resident and EAC Committee chairman, indicated that
presenters should be allowed to present without being
interrupted and preempted.
Mr.
Glassman indicated that the Ways and Means Committee reviewed
this at the direction of the Board of Supervisors and has no
complaint with the service being provided. It’s a good service.
It’s a public service and allowing a vote on the ¼ mill is
legitimate, but maybe is should be or could be a ½ mill. What is
good financially for the rescue unit and for the township?
Asking good questions, learning more about it is what the Ways
and Means Committee wanted to do. ¼ mill increase is great but
there is other consideration, especially with the LST bringing
in $650,000 in revenue, which is providing rescue and police
services. Putting it to a vote could be a risk. It’s a great tax
to ask the residents at this time, but perhaps it should be a ½
mill. Doylestown’s contribution may not be sufficient. It
doesn’t make it wrong. Also certain information on capital was
not provided by the CBA&RU because one of the presenters was not
able to attend the meeting. Again, making sure that Doylestown’s
share of 25% is correct.
Ms.
Schlager indicated that it has been a long four year process and
the CBA&RU has been providing yearly audits and monthly reports
and they don’t want to keep coming back asking for additional
funding.
Mr.
Glassman indicated that it would be best to put aside the funds
in the budget and make a commitment for 2-3 years.
Ms.
Schlager indicated that the township has to have ambulance
service.
Ms.
Eisenhardt indicated that with a referendum the CBA&RU has to
work to get it approved. If it does plan allocating the $50,000
through the LST and is done now should continue.
Mr.
Bennett indicated that Doylestown Borough is using their LST’s
and not asking the public to vote.
Mrs. Lyons indicated that we have more control over
participation then a separate allocated tax.
Mrs. Lyons indicated that the dedicated LST of $50,000 to the
ambulance was more appropriate.
Mr.
Glassman indicated that the Ways and Means wanted to do what is
best fiscally for the township. $50,000 LST means less for
police with the tax increase issue you put through would be
separate.
Ms.
Philo if you increase the tax rate it would be a separate
dedicated tax you need to increase taxes generates reallocation
of the LST should be put to a referendum.
Mr.
Paternostro indicated that the Ways and Means Committee has done
a tremendous job and they should be given the time to study the
issue and the referendum.
Ms.
Eisenhardt indicated that the CBA&RS has done a credible job.
They have met all the demands and the audit same as the fire
service. We cannot do without ambulance and we don’t have money
in the budget.
Mr.
Scarborough indicated that they looked at the ¼ mill indicating
that PSATS and BCATO have looked at it because patients don’t
necessarily pay the ambulance when they get their money from
insurance and so ambulance companies have been hurt and had to
close.
Ms.
Clegg indicated that the cost of steel and manufacturing is
going up and she agrees with Mr. Bennett that you don’t want
more taxes, what is the Township to do to prepare, if it doesn’t
pass by the public.
Ms.
Eisenhardt’s comment on the LST goes to the ambulance.
MOTION was ADOPTED 3-0-2. Ms. Lyons and Mr. Bennett opposed.
INN ON BLUEBERRY HILL – Rob Gundlach
Mr.
Gundlach is an attorney representing the Inn on Blueberry Hill,
indicated that he would be brief. He asked the Board of
Supervisors since the last time they have been before them that
they have met with the residents of the Greens. They are to go
back to the Zoning Hearing Board on June 21st. Their
meeting with the Greens was productive. The Board has a letter
from the Greens supporting the application of the Day Care
Center at the Inn on Blueberry Hill. Also a memo from Mr.
Deignan to the Zoning Hearing Board incorporating the items that
he agreed to provide to the Greens Homeowners Association is
attached for easy reference.
Ms.
Eisenhardt indicated that she went over to the open house and
reviewed the literature. Mr. Deignan has done an excellent job.
It is clear that the day care should be a permitted use in E-14
shopping center and she made a MOTION not to send the solicitor
to oppose the application before the Zoning Hearing Board. The
MOTION was seconded by Ms. Philo.
Ms.
Lyons asked if the entire building was going to be used for the
day care. Mr. Gundlach indicated that it would with 197
children.
Mr.
Scarborough indicated that it is the gateway to the township and
we don’t want a blight and he has no problem with day care.
Mr.
Bennett raised concerns about the day care specifically traffic,
safety, and the additional use variance for the play yard.
Mr.
Gundlach addressed how they came about having gone to a previous
hearing for another applicant that that relief was needed.
Ms.
Lyons restated that she still believes the use is inappropriate
place for day care because of the traffic nightmare, a busy
intersection, additional uses may go in as well and that the
items that Mr. Deignan has offered to the residents in agreeing
such as buffering and lighting should be provided regardless.
Mr.
Compton, Eagle Lane, indicated that his unit doesn’t look out
but he is excited and has followed the project and knows that
the township has made a number of concessions, but he lived in
New Jersey and his town gave out historical awards and he’d give
one to the Inn on Blueberry Hill project. He believes that the
day care is a better use and although there is not a guarantee
that other uses wouldn’t come in the future this is more
preferred because there are no weekend hours.
Margaret Gerard views the back of the property and the lack of
trees and believes a beautiful buffer and because the children
will be playing in the side yard would be a wonderful addition
to the property. She believes the day care is a least impact and
doesn’t find it offensive.
The
MOTION was ADOPTED 3 -2. Ms. Lyons and Mr. Bennett opposed.
VISITORS/PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Richard Kroll, Turkey Lane, complimented the road department for
some repairs on Turkey Lane regarding drainage.
Mr.
Everett asked when the Public Water & Sewer Advisory Committee
would meeting and plan to make their presentation.
Ms.
Mason indicated that they did not meet in July would be meeting
in August. They are hoping to have the information on the Pebble
Ridge area sometime in September.
Mr.
Bob Pearson, Pine Run Community, indicated that he is a life
member of the Transportation Engineers Association and he is
concerned about the traffic on Ferry Road, specifically the
speeding volume of the vehicles. He hopes that Doylestown
Township and New Britain Township could study with PennDOT the
situation.
Mr.
Scarborough indicated that the township is working with Sen.
McIlhinney try to address some poor drainage areas.
Ms.
Philo indicated that the police department could schedule their
speed timing device as well.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Next meeting is August 5, 2007
MINUTES APPROVAL:
Board of Supervisors’ Meeting – June 17, 2008:
Mr.
Scarborough made a MOTION, seconded by Ms. Eisenhardt to approve
the minutes of the Board of Supervisors meeting of June 17, 2008
as submitted.
MOTION was ADOPTED 4-0. Ms. Philo abstained.
REPORTS:
Solicitor: No report.
Police Chief: No report.
Township Engineer: No report.
Manager: No report.
Supervisors:
Mr.
Bennett indicated that the Ways and Means Committee has
developed a new reporting system on the financials and that the
Board has received a copy. He wanted to thank Ed Ebenbach for
his assistance with the Ways and Means Committee working with
the staff to create this new format that provides actuals,
budget and projections for the department heads and what they
anticipate by year end.
Mr.
Ebenbach indicated that it was able to be flexible and can be
expanded and collapsed and provide forecasts and should be
helpful.
Ms.
Eisenhardt indicated that she would like to recognize the recent
passing of Robert Sugarman, longtime attorney. She asked that
his family be kept in everyone’s prayers. He will be missed.
Ms.
Eisenhardt wanted to talk about the township policy for
employees and vehicle usage.
Ms.
Philo made a MOTION that the Board of Supervisors review and
discuss the existing policy and look at revising the policy.
The
MOTION was seconded by Ms. Eisenhardt.
Ms.
Eisenhardt then presented a chart and provided a handout that
had been prepared by the township manager provided for the
Executive Session regarding vehicle usage.
Some of the board members indicated that they objected to the
information being passed out as it was intended to be used for
Executive Session earlier in the evening.
Ms.
Eisenhardt indicated that she felt that the information was
public information and that she thinks its important to compare
what we do to other municipalities and that we look at our
policy and make changes and that we need to stay on top of
things.
Mr.
Bennett questioned what the board was expected to do and
consider independently the policy over how it impacts individual
employees.
Ms.
Eisenhardt indicated that the information was clear and that
there are more vehicles on the road then other municipalities.
We have nine compared to 3.2 average of the others.
Mr.
Bennett indicated that it is dangerous to throw out information
in that format especially when two of the vehicles are owned and
maintained by the DTMA. He indicated that he has done a
calculation based on the price of gas that the township uses and
the to – from distance and its less than $6,500 or less than a
dollar per property per year for allowing department heads to
have the vehicles to drive to and from home. He believes that
discussing new policy is one thing but the personnel and the
aspect of providing service to the community is another aspect
that needs to be considered as part of how we want to do
business in Doylestown Township. He supports the MOTION.
He
indicated that our employee relationship is unique and needs to
be further reviewed.
Joe
Paternostro wanted to know the emergency response vehicles and
whether people had experience with CPR and blood borne
pathogens.
Ms.
Philo called the question on a vote.
The
MOTION passed 5 – 0.
Mr.
Scarborough indicated that the TAB Board had installed the
cameras and microphones. They hope to be able to work with the
Township in being up and running soon.
Ms.
Eisenhardt indicated that with the price of gas letter from
PSATS July 1st the IRS reimbursement rate went up to
58.5 cents per mile. She made a MOTION for the Board to
increase our current rate. The MOTION failed for lack of a
second.
Ms.
Philo indicated that the open space and traffic committee had
been meeting and that the Traffic Advisory Committee is doing
some speed studies on Steeplechase and looking at Hidden Lane in
terms of access and traffic issues. The Open Space Committee
indicated that the open space information from the county plan
has been sent to the county and that under the new program we
will be able to start to expand new properties as well.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None.
NEW BUSINESS:
LAND DEVELOPMENT:
Eastburn Tract – Preliminary Major Subdivision – Review
Extension to 9/11/08:
On
MOTION of Ms. Philo, seconded by Mr. Scarborough.
MOTION was adopted 5-0.
Zoning Hearing Board Application – Janet King – 945 Pebble Hill
Road – Appeals from a determination of the Zoning Officer:
The
Board agreed to leave this matter to the ZHB.
2008 Pavement Marking Bid:
On
MOTION of Ms Philo, seconded by Mr. Bennett the 2008 Pavement
Marking bid was awarded to A-1 Traffic Control Products, L.L.C.
in the amount of $26,917.64.
MOTION was ADOPTED 5-0.
Bill’s List – July 15, 2008:
Ms.
Eisenhardt made a MOTION, seconded by Mr. Scarborough to approve
the Bills List of July 15, 2008 in the amount of $525,125.89.
MOTION was ADOPTED 5-0.
Treasurer’s List – July 15, 2008:
Ms.
Eisenhardt made a MOTION, seconded by Mr. Bennett to approve the
Treasurer’s
MOTION was ADOPTED 5-0.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Ms.
Lyons announced that the next meeting of the Board of
Supervisors is scheduled for Tuesday, August 5, 2008.
ADJOURNMENT: 8:30 P.M.
|